Faced with a daunting list of errands and a cold breeze, I have two choices: Go outside, or blog. I have chosen to blog.
There are two types of gender issues, that sometimes - but not always -overlap: 1. Things that bother me or I am interested in theoretically 2. Things that I am interested in or bother me because they affect my daily life.
I usually try to blog about the former, rather than open my life up to the interwebz - in part because this blog is not completely anonymous.
But I was thinking today about something that bothers me in my daily life, that I think is a general problem that affects many women: I am (I think) a pretty good person to approach about guy problems - or at the very least, my return record is good, such that people who approach me for advice once tend to come back.
I am however, a lot less good at following my own advice. Things like "allow yourself to feel whatever you want to feel", which I must tell my friends a hundred times a day, just don't ring true when I am standing there judging myself. Part of this is due to the general axiom that it is easier to say than to do.
Part of it however, has to do with the gendered way in which I was raised: My parents are lovely human beings. They look after elderly people with no relatives, donate food and clothing to the homeless on a regular basis, etc.
However, my mother is Brazilian, and there are different expectations there that are placed on women: I have been raised to be perfect for a man - to change my hairstyle every month, to go to the salon every week, to keep a neat household - and, most importantly - to cook meat. I have been taught that men expect and deserve perfection, and anything else not only is unbecoming of me as a woman, but also may lead my man to find greener pastures.
I have consciously ditched most of these axioms: I have no patience for fancy hairstyles or salons, keep a slightly messy yet incredibly clean (I can not go to bed if there are dirty dishes in the sink. It just does not happen.) apartment, and would much rather cook chicken.
I am also a relatively confident person, and certainly not the type to wonder about if someone is cheating; thank God, I have never been in a situation where the thought even occurred to me. (This might say more about the guys I've dated than it says about me.)
But somehow, there are moments when I go afraid, because I see the standard of perfection and realize that I fall short. In such moments, I do not grow afraid of a man "finding someone else", but I grow afraid of not being the woman I need to be in order to build a relationship.
As much as I'd love to blame my mother, I think a large part of this fear has to do with pop culture: As a woman, I am surrounded by magazines (which admittedly I haven't read since I'm thirteen, but I see the covers) that tell me how to be perfect for a man - and the implication is, "Be perfect. Or else."
A male friend of mine gave me much saner advice: "Just be real." He then reminded me that being our real selves is part of the teshuva (repentance) process: This reminded me of a rabbinic legend, taught to me by my Bible teacher, Ms. Weinstein, that Adam, the first man, was created out of the* dust from the earth of the land of Israel. Thus, when God tells Abraham to go to Israel, He says "Lech lecha", got to yourself, because by going to Israel, Abraham is literally going to himself, i.e. going back to the physical origin of himself as a human being.
To me, worship of God should be a constant journey of "lech lecha", of going towards oneself, of becoming who one wants to be. I also think that if we are created in the image of God, it makes sense that worshipping God would be such a journey, for in doing so, we are developing the godliness within ourselves.
That is why, in Isaiah 55:6, which is customarily read on fast days, it says: "Seek the Lord in His being found, call upon Him in His being near."
God is always near; it is in His** being near - i.e., always - that we should feel comfortable calling upon Him.
The chapter goes on in verse 7 to say, "A wicked man will leave his path, and a man of iniquity his thoughts, and return to God who will have mercy on him, and will return to God who will abundantly forgive."
I believe that this verse hints to the fact that God implanted in man a spark of godliness; this spark constantly yearns to do good, and constantly seeks to connect to the main fire (i.e. God), and it is because of this that God is always near and that people will repent - for God created humans in such a way that to be good and connect to God is merely to return to themselves, to who they want to be as human beings.
In chapter 1 of Isaiah, God explicitly says: "10:Hear the word of the LORD, ye rulers of Sodom; give ear unto the law of our God, ye people of Gomorrah. 11 To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto Me? saith the LORD; I am full of the burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he-goats. 12 When ye come to appear before Me, who hath required this at your hand, to trample My courts? 13 Bring no more vain oblations; it is an offering of abomination unto Me; new moon and sabbath, the holding of convocations--I cannot endure iniquity along with the solemn assembly. 14 Your new moons and your appointed seasons My soul hateth; they are a burden unto Me; I am weary to bear them. 15 And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide Mine eyes from you; yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear; your hands are full of blood. 16 Wash you, make you clean, put away the evil of your doings from before Mine eyes, cease to do evil; 17 Learn to do well; seek justice, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow. {S} 18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD; though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool."
The purpose of the sacrifices was to help people actualize their godly spark. This actualization occurs through mitzvoth ben adam lechaveiro, interpersonal interactions. If the sacrifices are not helping that process of actualization, they are merely a waste of animal blood.***
I believe that the proof that this spark of godliness is how one interacts with others can be seen from the writings of the rabbis. In Deuteronomy 11: 22 it says, "For if ye shall diligently keep all this commandment which I command you, to do it, to love the LORD your God, to walk in all His ways, and to cleave unto Him". The Sifrei, a collection of Aramaic rabbinic writings, explains what it means to walk in God's ways and cleave to Him: "just as He is merciful, so too you should be merciful; just as He is gracious, so too you should be gracious."
Thus, assuming that cleaving to God means actualizing one's godly spark (tzelem Elokim) and that cleaving to God means acting kindly and mercifully towards human beings just as God acts kindly and mercifully towards human beings, then actualizing one's godly spark and journeying towards oneself means acting kindly and mercifully towards others.
I believe that is also part of why Judaism has so many metaphors about romantic relationships and one's relationship with God:The fountain of love is kindness. This applies to both romantic love and to love for God; in both kindness is essential to building the relationship.
That is why, when in Genesis chapter 24, when Eliezer looks for a wife to Isaac, he does not look for a monotheist: Instead, he looks for someone who is kind, as evidenced by her willingness to give his camels water. Eliezer understood that kindness was the root of both marriage and a relationship with God, and thus was the most important quality he could search for.
I think this view, of love based on kindness, is much healthier than the love based on perfection that is toted by Cosmo, because no human is perfect, but many people are kind.
I hope that this upcoming year is one in which we all actualize "lech lecha", the process of journeying towards our true selves and being who we want to be. May it be a year of health, wealth, and happiness.
* I am relating this story for the spiritual value. It says nothing about my attitude towards the Big Bang and evolution.
** I am using "His" because English has no gender-neutral pronoun. God has no gender.
*** Interesting thought: If societies take out their aggression on animals, does that limit the aggression they practice on human beings? Not that I consider sacrifices to be taking out aggression, God forbid, though I do believe in the Maimonidean view that the third temple won't have sacrifices.